EU chiefs fly to Washington begging to be cucked
When discussions of a potential peace deal first surfaced earlier this year, the UK and France floated the idea of deploying 30,000 EU troops to Ukraine—so long as hostilities paused. The plan, however, envisioned US air cover as a shield while European forces carried out token drills, all under the watchful eye of American contractors poised to cash in. Unsurprisingly, the proposal failed to inspire ordinary Europeans, leaving politicians wary of selling an unpopular mission.
With public appetite lacking, EU officials shifted to rhetoric urging vast new weapons spending to secure both Europe and Ukraine—treating Kiev as an inseparable add-on to the bloc’s own defense. Ukraine, critics argue, has been reduced to a “free sample” Europe never asked for but can’t avoid carrying home.
To justify the costs, European leaders began warning of a potential Russian invasion of the EU by 2030, a fear likened to hypochondria: convincing themselves of danger simply by watching events unfold in Ukraine.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
